The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The poly line graph illustrates the information about the four various types of meats such as chicken, beef, lamb and fish intake by humans which was in a quarter years in a Europe from 1979 to 2004. Units were measured in grams per person per week.
In overall, there were lots of transformation can be observed in all kinds of meat consumption over the periods.
It can be seen from the information that meat of beef was most popular among European people for eating at the beginning of the period which accounted between 250 grams to 200 grams in one decade. Similarly, it decreased dramatically at less than a 150 grams in the end of the year. Likewise, consumption of fish meat that composed of almost a little more than a half grams remained relatively constant during the all years at 50 grams in Europe.
The graph further proves that ate to chicken meat attained a lowest figure in European people at first which experienced at about 150 grams. In contrast, a drastic increased can be noticed in intake of chicken meat and reached to peak level at over 250 grams per person per week during 2004. On the other hand, 150 grams meat of lamb was eaten by citizens of Europe region in 1979. Lastly, it followed in a zig zag ways and showing an up and down trend in the remaining years in European nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'year'?
Suggestion: year
...intake by humans which was in a quarter years in a Europe from 1979 to 2004. Units we...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 60, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...roves that ate to chicken meat attained a lowest figure in European people at fir...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, lastly, likewise, similarly, so, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5864978903 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45398464286 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548523206751 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4590141953 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.7 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201348575215 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775922492957 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466676932682 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126585222235 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200687947697 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.