The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph demonstrates amount of fish and meat of different types consume in a European country during a span of 24 years ranging from 1979 to 2004. Overall, chicken consumption increased significantly and contrast to beef and lamb. Whereas, fish consumption remain same. Units are expressed in grams.
To begin with, in 1979 beef and lamb were most popular with consumption of 220 grams and 150 grams per week. Both of them showed a sharp decline in 1982. After which, there was a sharp rise in brief popularity reaching to all time high of 250 grams per week, and it remained fairly same till 1988. Afterwards it fell dramatically till it reached its lowest figure of 120 grams per week in 2004. On the other hand, lamb also showed a steady downward pattern and fell to about 70 grams in 2004. Similarly, chicken which was about 140 grams per week in 1979 showed a tremendous positive trend with a significant rise in 1994 surpassing beef and lamb to reach 250 grams per week in 2004. Fish consumption however remain static with little fluctuations over time at 50 grams per week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph demonstrates amount of fi...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ficantly and contrast to beef and lamb. Whereas, fish consumption remain same. Units ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... same. Units are expressed in grams. To begin with, in 1979 beef and lamb wer...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, in brief, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71204188482 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5177639763 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586387434555 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7965730643 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8181818182 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138464241378 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612125063026 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610710407957 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148091250718 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759409235815 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.