The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart below shows in european country between 1979 and 2004 for the consumption some different kinds of meat and fish. Roundly, there was digression and escalation of rate consumption and the graph declared amount of consumption in the form of grams per person per week.
In 1979 to 1994, embark fine dining the fish start from 65 grams in the first year, afterwards down to 50 grams and stuck at the same number till 1994. Secondly, the lamb stood at the middle part for 150 grams, weaken at 80 grams and chicken nearly resembles is located in 149 grams and uphill to 230 grams. Subsequently, beef there was in highest line of 220 grams and drop to 190 grams.
In 1999 to 2004, the diagram reveals the dramatically of reduction for a few types consumption. The top consumption there chicken which recorded for 250 grams and
simply get off to 280 grams. In the second place, be found the beef that occur of 150 grams and be buried to 100 grams. Thirdly, the lamb run into diminish and rise up of 75 grams however, embedded on the identical stripes.
The outcome of representation above, european country had low readability in eating fish and chicken is popular cum predilection to consume of community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the highest'.
Suggestion: in the highest
...230 grams. Subsequently, beef there was in highest line of 220 grams and drop to 190 grams...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72300469484 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56921209736 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600938967136 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6851878153 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16809173192 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801003522949 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154756951123 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104885445112 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13517643872 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.