The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares how many grams of fish along with 3 other types of meat were eaten per person per week in a European country, from 1979 to 2004. In general, the consumption of beef, lamb and fish had the tendency to fall while that of chicken rose above.
The amount of chicken being used throughout the course of 25 years changed drastically. First, in 1979, an individual consumed only just under 150 grams of this kind of meat per week, which was lower than that of both produces lamb and beef. However, for the next few years, the number went up steadily and eventually took the number one place of beef in 1989 with about 205 grams. From 1989 forward, the consumption of chicken continued to increase, meeting the mark of 250 grams in 2004.
On the other hand, the usage of the remaining types of meat dropped. In 1979, beef and lamb were eaten the most with 220 grams of beef per person weekly and 150 grams for lamb. Though, these two meats couldn’t keep their status and the numbers decreased drastically starting from 1989. The consumption of beef went from 200 grams to just over 100 grams in 2004. Beside that, the amount of fish being eaten also declined slightly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Lovepreet123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | anasrafiq | 73 | view |
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History.Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the informaiton by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph compares how many grams o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l while that of chicken rose above. The amount of chicken being used through...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting the mark of 250 grams in 2004. On the other hand, the usage of the rema...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, so, while, in general, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59813084112 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23076888325 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57476635514 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7718598069 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4545454545 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117920739491 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476657191815 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377316570789 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966207254484 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400923711625 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.