the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
The line graph illustrates the variation in types of food consumed and how these Europe figures differed during a 5-year period from 1919 to 2004
It is clear that the amount of beef, lamb, and fish decreased, despite fluctuations, over the period shown, while a much smaller of fish had been consumed in comparison with the other three kinds of meat
In 1979, around 225 grams of beef per week was consumed, in comparison with over 50 grams of fish and roughly 150 grams of chicken and lamb. The amount of poultry rose dramatically, peaking at around 225 grams per week over the next 15 years. By contrast, the figures for beef and lamb dropped erratically to 200 grams and 75 grams. Furthermore, the trend of fish went up and down slightly as it hovered around 50 grams until the middle of the 1990s
In the period between 1994 and 2004, a fall was recorded for consuming three of the four types of food, whereas poultry rose enormously. By 2004, it is thought that around 250 grams of chicken were consumed, while the figures for beef and lamb were much lower, hitting a low of 100 units and 75 grams. However, fish was the least commonly used food in the European country with only about 60 grams
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rison with the other three kinds of meat In 1979, around 225 grams of beef per we...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57603686636 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32414364788 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539170506912 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 144.791420863 43.030603864 336% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 165.5 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.1666666667 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147168077652 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641719843681 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598438545363 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948901470472 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319357335814 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.32 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 11.4329268293 241% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.