The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart illustrates the number of people outputted carbon dioxide on average and how these figures altered according to four nations during a 40-year period from 1967 to 2007.

It is clear that both Italian and Portuguese releasing CO2 increased steadily, while for British and Swedish, they dropped over the period given. At the start of period, citizens from the UK and Sweden were the most emissions amounts, and following that the figures of Italy and Portugal eventually surpassed those for Sweden.

In 1967, over 9 tonnes of CO2 emissions per person was recorded for Sweden and Sweden, compared to around 4 tonnes of Italy and 3 tonnes of Portugal. The volume of fumes production of three out of four nations increased by roughly 1 tonne over the next 10 years. By contrast, the figures for British remained the same as it hovered 11 tonnes respectively.

Between the period from 1977 to 2007, a sudden plummet of CO2 release was witnessed for Sweden, with a jump of roughly 6 tonnes, whereas the trend of Italian and Portugal were seen significant similar with increasing. By 2007, it is thought that people living in Sweden and Portugal created 6 tonnes of emissions per person with the exception of Italian which saw higher over 1 metric tonne. Furthermore, British was a country outputted the most amounts CO2 over 4 decades.

Hope to see everyone's feedback. Just over 1,5 month later, I'm going to start the examination

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...reated 6 tonnes of emissions per person with the exception of Italian which saw higher over 1 metric ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 60, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...es feedback. Just over 1,5 month later, Im going to start the examination
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94672131148 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56318631386 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565573770492 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6549285722 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.727272727 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183717194188 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063935658223 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063884837017 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921788005585 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498995216481 0.0819641961636 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.