The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about Southland’s main exports in 2000, *20.., and future projections for 2025.

Here, we have set of bar chart. Bar chart spells out the information pertaining main exports of Southland’s in the years of 2000 and 2020. However, in chart, that also shows future projections in 2025.
Overall, there have three departments, international tourism, dairy products and meat products. All information provided in billion of euro (€). Highest exports for foreigners, lowest in meat products in that three years.
In 2000, international tourism exported 8 billion of euro. However, in present year, that is 9 billion of euro. Whereas, in 2025, that will be approximately 10 billion of euro, that is 2 billion more compare to past. In dairy products, that is fluctuations view. In 2000, that was only below 7 billion of euro. In 2020, that is going 3 time up and reached at around 10 billion of euro but in 2025, that expected value will be above to 9 billion of euro, that is 1 time down compare to present year.
In meat products, that is lowest export in all three years. In 2000, that was 6 billion euro, in present, that is little down below to 6 billion of euro value. In 2025, that will go downside and reached at 5 billion of euro, that is 1 time down compare to year of 2000. In this, we can see clearly descending view.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 124, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...t products. All information provided in billion of euro €. Highest exports for foreigne...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Highest'.
Suggestion: The Highest
...ormation provided in billion of euro €. Highest exports for foreigners, lowest in meat ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... that was only below 7 billion of euro. In 2020, that is going 3 time up and reach...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s 1 time down compare to present year. In meat products, that is lowest export in...
^^
Line 4, column 24, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the lowest'.
Suggestion: is the lowest
...o present year. In meat products, that is lowest export in all three years. In 2000, tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...at is lowest export in all three years. In 2000, that was 6 billion euro, in prese...
^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... down below to 6 billion of euro value. In 2025, that will go downside and reached...
^^
Line 4, column 270, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...is 1 time down compare to year of 2000. In this, we can see clearly descending vie...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 3.15609756098 475% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58744394619 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63380297215 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479820627803 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 1.53170731707 1045% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0164438105 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.9375 112.824112599 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.9375 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9375 5.23603664747 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202471359344 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819602719244 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862279821752 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154988075174 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120660007953 0.0819641961636 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.75 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.