The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line chart compares the average amount of exhaust fumes discharged per head in four different countries, namely the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, while English and Swedish citizens reduced their carbon footprint considerably over the 40-year period, the Italians and Portugues witnessed a significant rise in their toxic gas output. Also, it is clear that the number of carbon emissions in the United Kingdom was the highest among others throughout the period.
In 1967, there were 11 tonnes of CO2 released by an average English, compared to only over 8 tonnes produced by a Swedish. By 2007, the number of greenhouse gases in the UK had decreased gradually to 9 tonnes. However, in Sweden, after reaching its highest point at about 10 tonnes in the first decade, the quantity plummeted to slightly under 6 tonnes at the end of the period.
Looking at the other nations, the respective amounts of carbon dioxide produced per capita in Italy and Portugal are approximately 4 and 1 tonne in 1967. From that time onwards, Italians and Portugues showed a dramatic increase in CO2 emissions by roughly 4 tonnes, whose figures ended at around 8 and almost 6 tonnes respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01485148515 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65937442385 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633663366337 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1180480756 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.714285714 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255780267821 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114652350737 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667929687008 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144808133633 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521433411598 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.