The line chart illustrates the number of people outputted carbon dioxide on average and how these figures altered according to four nations during a 40-year period from 1967 to 2007.
It is clear that both Italian and Portuguese releasing CO2 increased steadily, while for British and Swedish, they dropped over the period given. At the start of period, citizens from the UK and Sweden were the most emissions amounts, and following that the figures of Italy and Portugal eventually surpassed those for Sweden.
In 1967, over 9 tonnes of CO2 emissions per person was recorded for Sweden and Sweden, compared to around 4 tonnes of Italy and 3 tonnes of Portugal. The volume of fumes production of three out of four nations increased by roughly 1 tonne over the next 10 years. By contrast, the figures for British remained the same as it hovered 11 tonnes respectively.
Between the period from 1977 to 2007, a sudden plummet of CO2 release was witnessed for Sweden, with a jump of roughly 6 tonnes, whereas the trend of Italian and Portugal were seen significant similar with increasing. By 2007, it is thought that people living in Sweden and Portugal created 6 tonnes of emissions per person with the exception of Italian which saw higher over 1 metric tonne. Furthermore, British was a country outputted the most amounts CO2 over 4 decades.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...reated 6 tonnes of emissions per person with the exception of Italian which saw higher over 1 metric ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9298245614 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55857811005 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55701754386 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8134050774 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.888888889 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190606422634 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781435822725 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622732987819 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115223500698 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02138134241 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.