People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns?
The propensity of living in metropolitan cities is increasingly popular, as places of opportunities. While inhabitants would confront some major drawbacks, I personally believe spurring people to migrate to the surrounding areas is an advantageous method.
Perhaps the worst problem stemming from this is the exorbitant cost of living in the city center. The citizens in the inner cities have to spend the inflated expenditures on houses, transport or even food rather than their neighborhoods. A further problem is that residents have been afflicted with social problems such as poverty rates, violent crimes in comparison with the vicinity. Finally, there are the mental and physical disorders caused to city dwellers by atmospheric pollutant, traffic congestion, and overcrowded public transport system. For example, inhaling the exhaust fumes released by vehicles is the reason for the incidences of asthma and lung cancer. In addition, people would perceive fatigue, commuting stress, and loss of concentration while they mire in jams.
In my opinion, the government should incentive locals to lure away from the main cities. This is due to the fact that this would relieve the current pressure on the infrastructure and consumption demands, leading the cost of reasonable adjustments. Fewer city dwellers would require public services such as hospitals and schools and the roads would more spacious, ensuring a smooth traffic flow with its resultant fewer road casualties and bottleneck. Furthermore, the sources in the countryside and other non-developed regions would be exploited potentially as there might be obtainable workforce there. However, government should consider the optimum conditions of effective method by ameliorating rural infrastructure and issuing appropriate incentive policies. For example, Japan has succeeded in attracting people and businesses to leave Tokyo by using tax cuts and providing the accommodations for new arrivals.
In conclusion, there are many troubles that people in cities are facing, and it is advisable that the government address these problems by encouraging people to relocate to smaller places.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73602484472 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0773890378 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621118012422 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.834712012 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.133333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24752976716 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731976848864 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919491836484 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17669033581 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127505978902 0.056905535591 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.