Many city-dwellers find it difficult to avoid encountering everyday life issues of living in large cities, one of which is traffic congestion they have to face every day while commuting to work. Encouraging people to relocate to countryside might be able to mitigate this problem.
Traffic jam is one of the main problems found in business area in big cities; hence, people who reside in the area have to deal with such problem every day. Research shows that the stress level of people who live in large cities is significantly higher than that of people who live in countryside; 80 percent of the subjects claimed that one of the major stressors is busy traffic in urban area. From my past experience, for example, when I worked in the centre of business area in my country, I had to rise incredibly early at 4.30 o'clock in the morning to travel to work which started at 8.00 A.M.; therefore, I was highly likely to be exhausted and not as efficient and productive as I wish I could be at work.
Given these circumstances, I am inclined to the opinion that the government should encourage more people to move to countryside. With this approach, the density of population in large cities would, hopefully, dramatically decrease; resulting in better traffic flow. Furthermore, if more people reside in countryside, they might bring more advancements and investments to those areas. As a result, local economic growth might improve, along with national economic growth.
In conclusion, traffic jam is considered to be one of the major issues that people living in large cities have to deal with every day. I personally believe that encouraging people to move to countryside might potentially be able to alleviate this issue. In addition, this solution might ultimately lead to better economic growth on a national level in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
... is busy traffic in urban area. From my past experience, for example, when I worked in the cent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: o'clock
... I had to rise incredibly early at 4.30 oclock in the morning to travel to work which ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98701298701 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84727487163 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.9544712343 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269111661046 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104419067794 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774000457636 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172876741406 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508481316945 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.