Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female student in every subject?
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
the same educational opportunities have been suggested for some time now, in an attempt to encourage gender equality in universities. It seems to me that this concept is not, in fact, pragmatic, and I will explain why in this essay.
On the one hand, enrolment of men or women the course should be dependent upon their respective academic performances and overall abilities. For example, if a female student is the best candidate for a certain degree, it is surely wrong to reject her in favor of a male who is considered unqualified. Secondly, the choice of subjects reflects gender-specific characteristics which are directly comparable to the pursuit of academic objectives. Examples can be seen that females are outstanding in some fields related to social subjects, while males are generally regarded as more logical, which enables them to have a better grasp of analytical subjects such as maths or physics.
I accept that this method can dispel traditional prejudice against gender equivalence, particularly in tertiary education. This means that traditional families often feel reluctant to support their daughter who enrolls in subjects one labeled unfit her gender identities such as a mechanic or an engineer. Finally, this trend might encourage people to overcome the hurdles that each gender can only excel at certain subjects and not others. For instance, males students would be likely to follow the literature which they would think that literary appreciation would be out of their depth. Despite this, it seems that the impracticality of the proposal is dominant because it appears the case very frequently that men study social subjects and women select analytical subjects.
To conclude, it might be seen that the aim of this concept is admirable, but it is unworkable and unfair in realistic terms due to the discrepancy of merit and characteristics according to gender.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the same educational opportunities have bee...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27062706271 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0158155079 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597359735974 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.9799326786 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.083333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108183974888 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372440556565 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255857367279 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545001416987 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467649156805 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.