Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problem people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or in the countryside. What extent do you agree or disagree
Easing the traffic density is a cause of widespread concern today, as so many people have been struggling with. The incentive for citizens settles on living in a metropolitan city instead of surrounding areas, while I personally believe that would be an impracticable method to avoid traffic problem. The following essay will expound upon both perspectives in addition to supporting my opinion.
Overpopulation would be stemmed from this encouragement which affects considerably on social problems, particularly transportation. The traffic congestion occurs when the volume of traffic users generates demand for space greater than the available infrastructure capacity. For example, roads in my city are outdated design and inappropriate traffic mix, leading gridlock, especially in peak time. It is clear that this traffic problem has a pessimistic consequence on air quality. Most of the vehicles have consumed on fossil fuel, a non-renewable resource, and emitted a high amount of air contaminants and carbon dioxide by their inside combustion engine which all contribute to climate change and global warming.
A further reason to be wary of this idea that is probably the most disquiet trouble on public infrastructure system. It is clear that it would accommodate insufficiently for the rapidly growing population, eventuating unsatisfactory services, overcrowding, and unpunctuality. This phenomenon force people a significant shift in demand toward the convenient option, personal transport. Furthermore, the major effects of overcrowded traffic on people in terms of both mental and physical health and road accident occurrences. For instance, researchers in Ghana confirmed that traffic jams effect on commuting stress, fatigue, and loss of concentration.
In conclusion, I tend to disagree that dealing with transportation issue can be dealt with promoting people living in the city center. It may lead to other solemn problem in terms of social and infrastructure in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70805369128 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33182273625 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640939597315 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9312828971 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.4 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208368433025 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627157825148 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510202192675 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129052944911 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330337785726 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.