The table below gives information about the underground railway
systems in six cities.
The table shows data about the underground rail networks in terms of the routes covered, annually commuters traveling and date of establishment in six major cities.
It is clear that the three oldest underground rail systems are larger and serve significantly more passengers than the newer networks.
The London underground system is the oldest, having opened in 1863. It is seen as the longest rail covered, with 394 kilometers, followed by underground rail in Paris, with 199 kilometers of route. On the other hand, the rail networks in Toky is twice as shorter as in London, but it serves the largest demand for traveling, with 1927 million passengers per year.
of the three newer networks, Washington DC is witnessed as the most extensive in size, with 28 kilometers of route, compared to merely 11 kilometers and 28 kilometers for Kyoto and Washington DC systems. Furthermore, Kyoto has the shortest route in line with the lowest commuters served, with 45 million per years, while Los Angeles is the newest system which is established in 2001.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...il networks in Toky is twice as shorter as in London, but it serves the largest de...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Of
...h 1927 million passengers per year. of the three newer networks, Washington DC...
^^
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: extensive
... Washington DC is witnessed as the most extensive in size, with 28 kilometers of route, compared ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11494252874 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78533520752 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7876531938 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104692741903 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581358326487 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828024098664 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863379415374 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971680793896 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.