the amounts of waste produced by 3 companies over a period of 15 years
The line chart illustrates the variation in waste amounts which three companies outputted and how these figures altered during a 15-year period from 2000 to 2015
It is clear that the amounts of waste of company A and B decreased during the period given. By contrast, for company C, a considerable rose could be seen in 2015, with the figures eventually surpassed those for company A. Overall, a much larger amount of waste was produced by company A in comparison with company B and C.
In 2000, around 12 tonnes of waste were made by company A, compared to about 8 tonnes of company B and 3 tonnes of company C. The amount of waste production of company A then dropped by roughly 1 tonne over the next five years in 2005. In contrast, the figures for both company B and C increased steadily, reaching nearly 6 tonnes and 10 tonnes.
In the period between 2005 and 2015, a sudden plummeted of waste amounts was company A and B, while company C still climbed steadily. By 2015, it is thought that around 3 tonnes of waste production were made by company B, whereas the figures for company A and B were much higher, at about 8 tonnes and 10 tonnes approximately
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ching nearly 6 tonnes and 10 tonnes. In the period between 2005 and 2015, a sud...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, still, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54028436019 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57649964901 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483412322275 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8071280039 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451382347465 0.215688989381 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221297274057 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125773582408 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292108623081 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453338263003 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.