The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.

The bar chart illustrates the time spent by UK residents on different types of telephone calls between 1995 and 2002.

It is clear that the number of minutes of 3 types of phones made rose each year over the given period. Furthermore, local fixed-line calls were the most popular, at least twice as high as those for any telephone in almost every year.

In 1995, Local - fixed line calls were the highest, accounting for over 70 billion minutes, followed by national and internet - fixed line and mobiles, each has nearly 40 and 5 billion minutes. The figures for UK phone calls rose gradually over the next 5 years. To be more precise, time spent on local-fixed line and national and international-fixed line increased by nearly 15 billion minutes, whereas for mobiles climbed merely 5 billion.

During the period from 1999 to 2002, a sudden drop for local-fixed line calls, while mobiles and national and international-fixed line conversed, they significantly increased. By 2002, it is thought that national and internal-fixed line and mobile reached peaked of 60 and 45 respectively. By contrast, time spent on local fixed-line hit to its lowest point, at around 70 billion.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, whereas, while, as for, at least

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09743589744 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00317198555 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594871794872 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8006293827 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157715135557 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809702107166 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609822918163 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124504833065 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710005969944 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.