Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities, privately owned vehicles should be banned in city centers, while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Easing the traffic density continues to be controversial as so many people are struggling with the traffic snarl-up. There are arguments on both sides of this every topical debate. While people claim that the prohibition of personal vehicles in the metropolitan city is an impracticable method, I believe that the traffic problem is resolved by banning automobile ownership. The following essay will expound upon both perspectives in addition to supporting my opinion.
Proponents of banning individual transport in the city center argue that it reduces traffic congestion. For example, privately transport owners would be banned, leading the fall for the volume of traffic, that diminishes demand for space on available infrastructure capacity and traffic congestion. Furthermore, traffic jams have a pessimistic consequence on air quality. Motorbikes, dominate vehicle in my country, are non-renewable sources consumption and carbon dioxide emissions which contribute to climate change and global warming. Lastly, there is the health issue caused to the vehicle users. The incidence of asthma and lung cancer has increased because of inhaling the exhaust fumes released by means of transport on the road.
Conversely, those who oppose the prohibition of vehicles say that it is the improbability as a result of insufficient public transport systems. For instance, in developing countries, the public infrastructure has not accommodated inadequately for a rapidly growing population, as the consequence, leading the overcrowding on public transport and non-punctuality which effect on people's mentality like disquiet and apprehension and their time schedule. Finally, the private means of transport dependency among citizens is expanding extensively. It is more attraction rather than public transportation because of its accessibility and comfort.
Overall, it is certain that this bans will hard implement, as private transport has given us so convenient. In my view, people should curb their vehicles and attempt to utilize public mode as the main of transport.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, furthermore, lastly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7654723127 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23353196571 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605863192182 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8435172697 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163425376758 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524918514127 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457894406366 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108165248189 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745680142538 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.