The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the
town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
The map compares two potential locations for the building of a new supermarket in a town called Garlsdon.
The main discrepancy between the two sites is that S1 is located in Garilsdon's suburb, whereas S2 is in the town center. The sites can also be compared in terms of access by road and rail, and their positions relative to three smaller towns.
Looking at the information in more detail, S1 is the vicinity of the town center to the northwest of Garlsdon, but it close to the residential area of the town. S2 is located nearby housing area, which surrounds the town center.
There are main roads which connect from three other towns called Hindon, Bransdon, and Cransdon to Garlsdon town center where has no traffic zone. This means that there would not access to S2 by means of transport. By contrast, S2 lies on the main road to Hindo, but it would be elusive to reach from Bransdon and Cransdon. Furthermore, both supermarket site are close to the railway that runs through Gralson from Hindon to Cransdon
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...burb, whereas S2 is in the town center. The sites can also be compared in terms of ...
^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'closes'?
Suggestion: closes
...er to the northwest of Garlsdon, but it close to the residential area of the town. S2...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74719101124 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52264707482 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578651685393 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2650720902 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8888888889 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224907014371 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992838485958 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133421327106 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177578238626 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163783392432 0.0819641961636 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.