Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The question of whether or not children are obliged to get involved in community service as school programmes are very topical today because its benefits are hard to quantify exactly. It seems to me that sending students to work in community service might provide them many valuable skills and knowledge, and I will elucidate why in this essay.
Firstly, students would gain experience and exercise skills by supporting volunteerism. In fact, most of the young children have a little social experience, as they spend much of their time at school. If children took part in community service, they would have an opportunity to encounter people from all social background, leading to enhancing interpersonal skills and solving problems which are beneficial for their performance in the future. A second positive factor is the development of young students' motivation to help others and serve the interest of others without reward. Children would witness at first hand the poverty that exists outside, resulting in feeling sympathy for those who suffer hardship. As a consequence, children might incline to help others without asking for payment and uphold a sense of community.
I accept there are some drawbacks of this programmes, most notably time children need to handle their homework and studies every day due to the fact that most schools require a full-time job. Addition, the schools should propagate the meaningfulness of the local community before enforcing a policy, ensuring the willingness among students. Despite this, it seems that for many high school students, these restrictions are overweighed by programmes' benefits.
To conclusion, the advantages of gaining interpersonal skills and rebuilding the cohesive among members of the community combine together to make student better preparation for future public life. I hope this programme will be put into action for high school/ colleges shortly
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether or not children are obliged to get invo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...tive factor is the development of young students motivation to help others and serve the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... I accept there are some drawbacks of this programmes, most notably time children ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42809364548 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83610068145 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622073578595 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3930891698 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.846153846 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219663636835 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07496626029 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468629793497 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131031447597 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147812892957 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.