The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the average amount of meats and fish which a person in European country consumed a week. The information is shown for fish, chicken, beef and lamb from 1979 to 2004.
In overall, these consumption numbers decreased during the period with the exception of chicken. Fish kept the lowest position throughout the time while the other meats changed their orders.
Starting with 60 grams in 1979, fish consumption number went down slightly to 50 by 1984. Then the figure remained steadily until 1994 at roughly 50 grams. Finally, it ended up the period at nearly 45 in 2004. Beef and Lamb did not see the similar stability as fish, they fluctuated significantly and decreased over the time. Beef and lamb took the first and second positions in 1979 in term of the grams a person consumed a week. After that, the number fell sharply throughout the 35-year period. In 2004, a person only ate 110 grams of beef and 75 grams of lamb per week as a half as their amount in 1979. While the number of other meats and fish decreased, in the European country, people preferred to choose chicken in their meals. Beginning at the third place with nearly 150 grams, chicken rose consistently. In 1989, it passed beef to become the highest consumed meat in the country. It remained the position until 2009, the number is 250 which larger than the sum of other food products at the same time.
In conclusion, there were many changes in the consumer habitat of this European country. Chicken became the favorite food while the other decreased in consumption.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ion numbers decreased during the period with the exception of chicken. Fish kept the lowest position ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 713, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to chicken'
Suggestion: to chicken
...ean country, people preferred to choose chicken in their meals. Beginning at the third ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile the other decreased in consumption.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, then, third, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80442804428 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43241455526 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538745387454 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.0970733797 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.5882352941 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9411764706 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82352941176 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140642052438 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485961150118 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049822996593 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10401069175 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763693336496 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.