The given line graph illustrates the how much amount of marine fish and various types of meat is consumed in a European country over a period of 25 years and is measured in grams per person per week.
Overall, Beef placed in the highest position initially in 1979 and in 1984 reached to peak and gradually decreased. The utilization of chicken substantially increased until 2004. whereas, Lamb steadily declined from 1979 to 2004. The consumption of Fish remained relatively low and stable rest of the period.
From 1979 to 1982, Beef declined to 170 grams and then rose to a peak level of 240 grams and decreased to 100 grams around 2004. Between 1979 and 2004, chicken and lamb followed a very different trend. The chicken started at around 140 grams per person while the lamb started at around 150 grams per person. By 1980, However, the two meat met at approximately 145 grams and then diverged. In contrast to chicken and lamb, Fish is started at 55 grams and slightly declined to 45 grams per person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
The given line graph illustrates the how much amount of marine fish and various...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rates the how much amount of marine fish and various types of meat is consumed i...
^^
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unt of marine fish and various types of meat is consumed in a European country o...
^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... gradually decreased. The utilization of chicken substantially increased until 20...
^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...ken substantially increased until 2004. whereas, Lamb steadily declined from 1979 to 20...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ken substantially increased until 2004. whereas, Lamb steadily declined from 1979 to 20...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at 55 grams and slightly declined to 45 grams per person.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72316384181 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48457850078 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536723163842 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0132905288 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126809367393 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061671854795 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457864204962 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970577041431 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215100457725 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.