The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing ,and business and financial services -to the UK economy in the twentieth century.
The bar graph illustrates the endowment under three categories ( agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services) to the British economy for 200 years, starting in 1900.
Overall, agriculture had the highest contribution to the economy of Britain for the past 50 years but dramatically declined in the succeeding period, while business and financial services had a gradual growth, whereas manufacturing sector significantly went down.
Initially, almost half of the contribution was on agriculture and slightly rose in 1950 to just over a half, which marked as the highest percentage under the given sectors throughout the period. However, the figure suddenly dropped to approximately 10 % in 1975 and hitting its lowest point to a tiny fraction in the end year, 2000.
In terms of manufacturing, the recorded data started nearly 45% and continued to fall slowly until 1975 with just above 40% as opposed to business and financial services from around 3% and climbed gradually and reached roughly a quarter until 1975. In the end year, 2000, business and financial services outraced the two categories with data approximately 35%.
- The graphs below shows the average CO2 emissions per person in the UK Sweden Portugal and Italy from 1967 to 2007 89
- The chart shows the amount of waste production by households in the UK from 1990 with projections until 2030. 78
- The pie charts show the percentage of water used for different purposes in 6 areas of the world 73
- The chart below indicates the primary uses of Internet in Japan in the years 1995 to 2005. 73
- The charts below show the average spending for British in 1971 and 2001. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tes the endowment under three categories agriculture, manufacturing, and business...
^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly, almost half of the contribution was on agriculture and slightly rose in 1950...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51685393258 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0507090372 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623595505618 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.4908249158 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.666666667 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246590920622 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115354102146 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858474487121 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15075697564 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801555075379 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.