The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005.
The line graph below illustrates three categories had (industry, transport, households) accounted for air pollutants, in millions of tonnes, in the UK for sixteen years from 1990 to 2005.
Overall, it is clear that the total amount of air pollutants fell over the period. Included in it, the most significant dropped was from industry.
There was a dramatic decrease in the total air pollutants from 7 million tonnes in 1990 to 4 million tonnes in 1999. From 1999 to the end of the period, this figure continuously declines from 4 to just over 3 million tonnes. In contrast, although transport accounted just below 1 million tonnes for air pollutants in 1990, there was a small fluctuation in this term, over sixteen years, before reached 1 million in 2005.
The number of air pollutants reduced suddenly from 5.5 million tonnes in 1990 to 3 million tonnes in 1996. This figures gradually reduced to 1 million tonnes in the next 10 years. Besides that, the air pollutants of households contributed 0.8 million tonnes at the beginning of periods. Although this figure slightly fluctuated over sixteen years, it also remained below 1 million tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | dothai | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | prathamesh27 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | quanganh3110 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | JennieD | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | elteembored | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on theprotection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the humanpopulation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993and 2012. 67
- The diagram shows the life circle of the honey bee. 61
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below illustrates three categories had ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...UK for sixteen years from 1990 to 2005. Overall, it is clear that the total amou...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ears, before reached 1 million in 2005. The number of air pollutants reduced sud...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05759162304 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72947157456 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497382198953 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6366425159 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265014241934 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121239575103 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777988665617 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186667822032 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625473466416 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.