The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005.
This line graph illustrates data about air pollution in the the UK from 1990 till 2005, where different factors such as industry, transport, and household are considered.
The most striking feature of this graph is total air pollutant which show remarkable decent. In 1990 it was at zenith, 7 million tonnes of air pollutants released in UK, after 90's steep fall recorded till 1999 and it recorded 4 and in 2005 it was ended at 3.2.
Transport source registered 1million ton of pollutants over 15 years, which is prity much constant throughout these years. Similarly, household shows gradual decreasing in the amount of the air pollutants over the 1990-1996 where it was starts from 0.8 and reached at 0.5, remains as it is for next couple of years then it felt down and in 2005 it was 0.3.
Industrial source has majority, However, it shows decent which is not constant throughout. rapid fall in 1993-1996 then after it was slowly reducing the pollution.
Overall, Although, in 1990 all factors were at pick but then started falling excepting transport .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...illustrates data about air pollution in the the UK from 1990 till 2005, where different...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...illustrates data about air pollution in the the UK from 1990 till 2005, where different...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 4 and in 2005 it was ended at 3.2. Transport source registered 1million ton...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it felt down and in 2005 it was 0.3. Industrial source has majority, However,...
^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Rapid
...ecent which is not constant throughout. rapid fall in 1993-1996 then after it was slo...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t was slowly reducing the pollution. Overall, Although, in 1990 all factors w...
^^^
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...then started falling excepting transport .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97191011236 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63548633251 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629213483146 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.993055319 43.030603864 237% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.5 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377496719426 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177478551186 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124243681078 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195363276744 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121393605762 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.