Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example.
Since the 20th century, packaging technology evolution has been taking place. Some people think consumer should avoid usage of packed products, while others stated it ia the producer's responsibility, we will discuss both points of view.
Firstly, wrapping, special coating's or number of layer's to preserve the food or the product which enhances the durability of the product, which help producer as well as consumer. This technology helps entire humanity with blessings. Nowadays it is much easier to eat diverse food from different part of the world without any sort of damage or change in it's taste. Packaged food keep itself away from the contamination for 2-3 months, which is biggest achievement in human history.
However, to prevent an adultration it required to go through a lot of critical processes. Although, mixture of many chemical contents which avoid fungal and bacterial growth inside packaging which are hazardous for society. Expiry date should be checked before purchase, crucial thing to do. The producer has to take responsibility of disposal of expired food material from the market to make sure to maintain a regular check up and track their material. While marketing involving such points into their advertisement for awareness.
Revamping quality of food and choose wise chemical addition help them to avoid fatal accidents. Maggie, which one of the favorite food in India banned due to its chemical contents such as mercury, which is dangerous for life. Maggie company penalized for this and removed its all products from the market.
In conclusion, society, the government as well as producer has to take responsibily, also taking the initiative to bring awareness in people to check and confirm expiry date of packaged food before consumption. Extra packaging also need to be avoided if possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'producers'' or 'producer's'?
Suggestion: producers'; producer's
...products, while others stated it ia the producers responsibility, we will discuss both po...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...we will discuss both points of view. Firstly, wrapping, special coatings or n...
^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the biggest'.
Suggestion: is the biggest
...the contamination for 2-3 months, which is biggest achievement in human history. Howe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iggest achievement in human history. However, to prevent an adultration it re...
^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'going', 'gonna'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: going; gonna
..., to prevent an adultration it required to go through a lot of critical processes. Al...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o their advertisement for awareness. Revamping quality of food and choose wis...
^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wise'
Suggestion: to wise
... Revamping quality of food and choose wise chemical addition help them to avoid fa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... company penalized for this and removed its all products from the market. In...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ved its all products from the market. In conclusion, society, the government a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, sort of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29896907216 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74436010424 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628865979381 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4824399494 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.375 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20590180413 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610030182051 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618882004914 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113125318455 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476789921176 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.