The given bar graph give information about various modes of transportation used by passengers of European cities to travel to and from work in 1960, 1980 and 2000. The data is calibrated in per-centum. It is clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it is evident that, passengers moving from one place to another for work in European countries prefer to utilize car in year 2000. Surprisingly, the downward trend was seen in cars as well as in buses in year 1980, while in 1960 buses were noticed as the first priority by the passengers as compare to cars and tubes.
It can be seen, in the comparison of train and car in 2000 cars were the first choice of people residing in European countries, but in 1980 train and buses were highly used by people.
As far as trend was concerned buses in 1960 were highly used by passengers it ranges about 35%. On other hand, in the same year cars were at least priority. Similarly, in 1980 trains and buses were available at the same rate lies between 26-30% and tubes are much less than train and buses about 22%. At last in year, 2000 more than 35% cars were used by people to travel and almost 25% buses were used by them to move from one place to another in European countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d buses were highly used by people. As far as trend was concerned buses in 196...
^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at the same rate lies between 26-30% and tubes are much less than train and buses...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, similarly, so, well, while, at least, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55156950673 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44917776339 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493273542601 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.429324369 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273236435835 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116264120233 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1533402453 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20311547573 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130138763398 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.