The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
The bar chart gives information about commuters employing different transport modes(train, car, tube, and bus) to travel to and from work in one European city in the three years of 1960, 1980, and 2000. Overall, it is clear that cars were becoming popular in commuting, while buses were less useful.
In 1960, among the four modes, buses, with almost 39% commuters, were most often used, which were followed by tubes(about 28% passengers) and trains(just under 20% passengers) respectively. However, cars, with merely around 7% commuters, were the least popular.
Over the period of these years, the proportion of car passengers showed a dramatically increasing trend, rising to about 23% in 1980, and in 2000, peaking at the highest point(almost 37%). By contrast, the figures for people using buses presented an opposite trend, declining to about 26% in 1980, and in 2000, bottoming out at 15%.
However, the number of people using trains experienced a fluctuation during this period, rising to about 28% in 1980, and falling back to around 21% in 2000. By contrast, a different fluctuation could be seen in the percentage of people taking tubes. It at first declined to approximately 23% in 1980 and in 2000 increased back, less slightly, to 25%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10243902439 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73603316023 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624390243902 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3872228716 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247540996616 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914601216268 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114284423204 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137735003217 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977838578682 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.