Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, some people think that they are the best people to talk to school students the danger of committing crimes. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is argued that those reformed offenders can be the best people to help students know the danger of breaking laws. I disagree with this view.
It is reasonable that some people think that ex-prisoners are the most suitable people to teach students the importance of obeying rules since their rich experience about crime and penalties. However, they are simplifying the situation. In my view, people who have broken laws have no qualification to discourage young people from having intention of crime due to lack of professional guidance in terms of education. On the country, when sharing their own experience with those young students, sometimes they may even generate the adverse influence on young people that they may be misguided by the thrilling parts of their stories, as a result, they have more potential to break laws.
On the other hand, however, the more suitable people who can actually help students get rid of committing crimes are policemen. Policemen are also familiar with crimes and penalties, while they are the side of justice and laws, because of which, they can guide students to the positive road with professional knowledge of laws instead of talking about how stimulating committing crimes is. Besides, teachers can help students build the correct social values and erase the intention of committing crimes. Since they have sufficient experience of teaching, they have more effective methods to make students understand the seriousness of breaking laws.
To summarize, although some people believe that prisoners who reintegrate into the society can do well in deterring students from crimes. However, I disagree with that and think that policemen and teachers are the suitable people to teach students about obeying laws.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, however, if, may, so, well, while, talking about, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29285714286 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67760935103 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510714285714 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9563355879 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364436751476 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144345705567 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589893750139 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244980447023 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490098761224 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.