The graph below shows electricity production in terawatt hours in France between 1980 and 2012. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words.
Given is a line graph which illustrates the production of electricity in France over a 32 years period from 1980 to 2012.
A glance at this graph depicts that the nuclear power was by far the most important source of electricity production in this period; in contrast, the renewables had a small role in this area.
In 1980 thermal power was the main source of electricity production by more than 100 terawatts per hour. In contrast, renewable was the least important source with no electricity power production. Meanwhile, the Hydroelectric and nuclear powers, with more than 50 terawatts per hour production, were in the same place.
It is clear that in a few years, the nuclear power dramatically rose to a peak of approximately 450 terawatts per hour in 2005, while hydroelectric power fluctuated in the same level (near 50 terawatts per hour) over this period of 32 years. On the other hand, thermal power fell to less than 100 terawatts per hour in 1980 and stayed at there for the rest of this given period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'terawatt' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'terawatts'.
Suggestion: terawatts
...electricity production by more than 100 terawatt per hour. In contrast, renewable was th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'terawatt' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'terawatts'.
Suggestion: terawatts
...c and nuclear powers, with more than 50 terawatt per hour production, were in the same p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'terawatt' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'terawatts'.
Suggestion: terawatts
...lly rose to a peak of approximately 450 terawatt per hour in 2005, while hydroelectric p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'terawatt' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'terawatts'.
Suggestion: terawatts
...er fluctuated in the same level near 50 terawatt per hour over this period of 32 years. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'terawatt' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'terawatts'.
Suggestion: terawatts
...nd, thermal power fell to less than 100 terawatt per hour in 1980 and stayed at there fo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75568181818 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76568008128 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505681818182 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5794111088 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177178944416 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101248157471 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507575382974 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121433442986 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383303985571 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.