the graph below shows the employment rate of each gender in four countries in 2002
The bar graph shows the employment rates of men and women in south Africa, Chile, Finland, and Norway in 2002.
Overall, it is clear that the proportion of men in the workforce was higher than that of women in all four countries. Also noticeable was that the employment figures for the two sexes in Finland and Norway were relatively close, while there was more of a difference in south Africa and Chile. In the latter case, the gap between the percentages of men and women was the largest.
Looking at the graph more closely, one can see that nearly 80 percent of Norwegian men were in work, which makes them the group with the highest rate of employment for the period. the proportions of employed Chilean and Finnish men were close behind at roughly 70%. however, the percentage of south African men in work was low compared to to others since only half of them held jobs. as above 70 percent. Finland was second with around 65% of women in work . the rates for south africa and chile were lower; only about one-third of women worked in both countries. moreover, Chile's female employment rate was only half of what its male rate was.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...an that of women in all four countries. Also noticeable was that the employment figu...
^^^^
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th Africa and Chile. In the latter case, the gap between the percentages of men a...
^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...hest rate of employment for the period. the proportions of employed Chilean and Fin...
^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...h men were close behind at roughly 70%. however, the percentage of south African men in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...th African men in work was low compared to to others since only half of them held jo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en in work was low compared to to others since only half of them held jobs. as ab...
^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...ers since only half of them held jobs. as above 70 percent. Finland was second wi...
^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ers since only half of them held jobs. as above 70 percent. Finland was second wi...
^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... second with around 65% of women in work . the rates for south africa and chile we...
^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...cond with around 65% of women in work . the rates for south africa and chile were l...
^^^
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...hird of women worked in both countries. moreover, Chiles female employment rate was only...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60591133005 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29681318931 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56157635468 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5324656388 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154923037434 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635908196826 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762673802306 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145611523069 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872321689135 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.