The charts show the info about the use of the Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Presented is the bar graph illustrating the popular rate of cyberspace in five different Europe countries, while the pie chart give the level of expense on buying online pattern.
Overall, it is transparent from the charts that the quantity of using internet was the most popular in UK and Sweden, where residents paid for the highest amount of shopping online, the opposite was true for Spain in the given year.
To begin with, the rate of people who accessed to internet in Sweden was accounted for the lion’s share at 35 percent, almost twice time higher than the figures for UK at 20%. In contrast, the figure for those in Spain made up the smallest proportion at 5%, and France had twice as same as the former country; however, it still lower than in comparison with German for 5%.
Next, we can see in the pie chart that the amount of people who participated in internet in a nation was more and more, as the result, the percentage of buying online in the nation was also larger than. UK had the highest rate of expenditure per person on shopping cyberspace, and the second position is Sweden accounted for 28%. In the contrast, Spain residents spent the lowest their wage in the field estimate at 4%, almost firth time and fourth time in order lower than France and Germany.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the bar graph illustrating the popular rate of cyberspace in five different Eu...
^^
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar rate of cyberspace in five different Europe countries, while the pie chart gi...
^^
Line 4, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... field estimate at 4%, almost firth time and fourth time in order lower than Fra...
^^
Line 4, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ost firth time and fourth time in order lower than France and Germany.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, still, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65350877193 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40230393031 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548245614035 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.5841095195 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.571428571 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5714285714 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.077183890235 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367784955197 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336234860678 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0563771432341 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289895013657 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.