Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
The administration funding should use an effective way instead of supporting the arts and cultures. The essay will discuss the problem and offer personal sight on hand.
There are some reasons why the government should prioritize social problems and elsewhere than arts. First of all, in many regions, especially these impoverished nations, local inhabitants are now besieged with varied points such as poverty, social unrest or unemployment, so on; accordingly, facing those difficulties as mentioned above, personalities from those countries would by no means immerse in aesthetic value. Therefore, social funding should be spent on essential items to avoid consuming money; thus, this is the best option for immigrants when nation leaders follow the opinions. In addition, it is undeniable that a lend of competence is required when it comes to the appreciation of art and culture; however, people of such equality account for only a minority of the population. Consequently, government funding should prioritize the majority of taxpayers. Taking health and education as a prime example, they are crucial tasks of which governments should also take responsibility. Somebody who is benefiting from the programs, such as hospitals and schools, believes that arts are a luxury, and the party cannot afford this extravagance.
On the other hand, based on my expertise, I think that property in the arts would profit both the government and aesthetic figures. First, suppose countries have famous works of art for a long time; In that case, it will help the tourism industry of the states become tourist attractions because individuals are usually curious about why the works of art are praised and have such priceless value. As a result, immigrants will increase their income while the council of nations also a lucrative investment from the industry. Next, cultural heritages and arts distinctiveness from places should be preserved and bequeathed from generation to generation, which avoids cultural assimilation. Taking DongHo village, a village that acquires a reputation for painting in Vietnam as a prime example, this village had been pushed to the verge of disappearance throughout; however, the problem is being solved by the assistance of the government. Now, dong ho village is an aesthetic symbol of Vietnamese culture.
In conclusion, the government should not waste money on the arts, and that money should use to help shanty areas and compatriots. Significantly, the amount of the money that can use for manufacture in poor countrysides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 629, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ons. In addition, it is undeniable that a lend of competence is required when it comes...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40350877193 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0356226595 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4226489204 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.823529412 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4705882353 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193718087047 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560480354885 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475621871954 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109233095246 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571791527838 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.