The graph below shows the fertility rate of women of different Gulf Countries from 1990 to 2000.
The supplied bar graph enumerates the fertility rates of women in 6 different countries between 1990-2000. The noticeable feature of the chart is the collapsed rates of fertility of all the countries.
As is evident from the bar graph, the fertility rate of each woman of natives of UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar were on an average 3-4 while the latter was almost twice in the case of Saudi Arabia in 1990. It is interesting to note that Omani women had the eminent rate of fertility that was 7 to be precise.
To continue with an explanation, female citizens of Oman had controlled the birth rate to a certain extent. However, the rates of Bahrain, Kuwait, and UAE plummeted to 2-3 in 2000. Not just this, there was a significant reduction in the fertility rates of women in Qatar. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabian ladies remained at the top position in the concerned decade.
All in all, even though there was a curtail in the rates of fertility but still females of S.Arabia and Oman continued to show a fairly higher rate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e. All in all, even though there was a curtail in the rates of fertility but still fem...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Arabia
...tes of fertility but still females of S.Arabia and Oman continued to show a fairly hig...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73888888889 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60229599478 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4129607757 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7777777778 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379168523046 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158582473547 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133734054911 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239105152328 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115222708796 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.