Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?
At the outset of this new millennium, nuclear technology is extensively used. Many people are afraid of nuclear technology because of the dangers associated with it because the belligerent leaders and terrorists may cause great human destruction with its use. However, if used wisely it has a plenty of merits. I utterly concur that it can be supportive in numerous ways. This essay will scrutinize its pros and cons.
To begin, the most worrying aspect of nuclear technology is its use in military purpose. Enough atomic bombs have already made to completely destroy the entire planet. Moreover, many hostile individuals of countries like India, Pakistan, Iraq, Korea and more has undertaken this process to diminish the others. To epitomize, After the fall of Russia, dwellers are frightened to use this harmful technology.
On the flip side, it is widely used in medical science. X-rays are broadly used in the several kinds of treatments. In addition, Radiotherapy is the extensively employed technique in the field to cure some diseases like cancer. Furthermore, controlled and measured radiations are applied on the threatening type of cancer that is malignant to diminish it and to stop its further expansion. Last but not least, it also lends a helping hand to improve the quality of food and to eliminate the malnourished tragic items.
Hammering the last nail of this topic, Although it has a number of benefits but one has to bear this in mind that if it is not handled properly it can destroy the entire world and leave it in ashes. Nuclear technology should only be used for the ease of humankind otherwise one will responsible for its own destiny.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: AFRAID_OF_HEIGHT[2]
Message: The noun should be probably in the plural form: 'technologies'.
Suggestion: technologies
...used. Many people are afraid of nuclear technology because of the dangers associated with ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03249097473 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77623196644 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595667870036 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5385844623 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.125 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230060037752 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686667971136 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856189309807 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131363681821 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648264696627 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.