Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?
Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
There are those who are of the opinion that nuclear technology could wipe out the entire population of people. However, I support the notion that nuclear energy has proven itself as beneficial to the society especially because it is a source of energy in some countries.
It is true that nuclear technology serves a useful purpose in the military as there are powerful and mighty countries who use it to make weapons good enough to create mass destruction. This enables them to pose as a threat to other countries but could also destroy the area where nuclear power stations are built if the energy source is not properly handled. Such case happened recently in Russia where two major explosions occurred within two weeks which made the people swarm in different pharmacies looking for iodine or iodine-containing medications to protect themselves from nuclear radiation.
However, nuclear technology can benefit the society if used on its advantage because it serves as a perfect source of energy. Initially, it is highly expensive to build nuclear power plants but in the long term, this goes down at a significant rate as the materials used to make nuclear energy is seen as cost-effective. In the USA, there are a lot of nuclear power plants provide energy to a wide range of areas that other energy sources are not able to give.
Moreover, nuclear energy helps reduce global warming because they do not emit high levels of carbon excess in the atmosphere. The smoke formation seen in many nuclear power plants is water vapor coming from the inside of the power source which is not harmful to the surrounding area. As a result, these plants are able to provide energy to the society without adding up to the current problem with pollution.
As a whole, some may think that nuclear technology can cause chaos as is being used in the military sector. However, I predominantly support the notion that it serves a good use to the society if being used in a more constructive way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | Jonkun | 73 | view |
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Using cellphones and computers made communication among people much easier. As a result, letter-writing could be lost in the future. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement? What is your opinion? 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. 73
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88200589971 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64300529319 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513274336283 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.1172777516 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.307692308 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0769230769 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203016599956 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819308502512 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660771678102 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12829060954 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743557395706 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.