A zoo has no useful purpose. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Zoos are amenities in which animals are confined in an enclosure for displaying as well as breeding purpose. Over the millennia, it is a moot issue that does zoos has any significant role to play or they are just to imprison the amazing creature of almighty. I moderately concur with this notion. This essay will scrutinize the both viewpoints and will give a sophisticated solution.
From the one side, zoos have an essential and cognitive purpose in this contemporary epoch. The first and foremost is an integral part of an educational system. For instance, Children often see various kinds of fauna in the books and this boost up their internal instinct to have a glance of them in real which in turn provides them an amazing experience. However, it is also necessary to rear the animals and give them proper medical care which is only possible in the zoo. Moreover, it is necessary to undertake the animals in the zoo who are facing extinction.
On the flip side, it is an undeniable fact that animals look splendid in their natural habitat only. Also, forests lose their beautiful natural environment. In addition, it is really an inhuman activity to put the free animals in cages, as, animals lost their freedom and they become sole entertainment object of individuals. Last but not least, it is a frequent issue that many animals die after they are confined in the cages.
Hammering the last nail of this topic, I think wildlife should be kept in cages only if the authorities provide an agreement for proper care and maintenance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: have
...nnia, it is a moot issue that does zoos has any significant role to play or they ar...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, really, so, well, for instance, i think, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85984848485 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7149315683 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0076523803 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6428571429 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0594189619863 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0253719776926 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321237573771 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0360428452021 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400353765762 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.