The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The graph depicts an information of usage of energy in the USA from 1980 until 2030. The striking feature of a line chart is predicted highest usage of petrol and oil in 2030 while hydropower remains lowest.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly observed that petrol and oil as a major source of fuel used extensively in all the years started from 35 quadrillions in 1980 to 40 quadrillions in 2005 by several ups and downs. Later, it rose gradually and expected to 49q till 2030. However, usage of wind, nuclear and hydropower was almost constant from 1980 to 1987. Afterward, nuclear slowly soared and even expected to maintain consistency and consume 9q energy till 2030
In addition, by several fluctuations utilisation of hydropower remained constant even forecasted to be same. On the other hand, the wind is predicted to be soared by 3q till 2030. Moving further, consumption of coal surged dramatically and expected to double till 2030 while only 5q increment is yet forecast of Natural gas with respect to its use in 1980.
To sum up, fossil fuels will remain the first priority of individuals followed by coal and natural gas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'predicted the highest'.
Suggestion: predicted the highest
...The striking feature of a line chart is predicted highest usage of petrol and oil in 2030 while h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...clear slowly soared and even expected to maintain consistency and consume 9q ener...
^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fluctuations'' or 'fluctuation's'?
Suggestion: fluctuations'; fluctuation's
...gy till 2030 In addition, by several fluctuations utilisation of hydropower remained cons...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, while, in addition, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87179487179 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71744552672 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605128205128 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7423753918 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20363940789 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935344078402 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119860655712 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117288451015 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092980545766 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.