This line graph below provides us information on comparison of four nominal data, residence of overseas students from Kong Kong, Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore in Australia on an interval scale between 1982 and 2000 years.
It’s clearly seen that the arrival of students from all four countries to Australia increased considerably over the period of 18 years. Indonesia is reported as the most dramatic change among other countries.
In 1982, there were no students from Singapore and Hong Kong and remained a steady trend until 1987, while the amount of students from Malaysia was about 5000 and stayed stable until 1990. However, the proportion of Hong Kong learners fluctuated wildly between 1987 to 2000 years with the number from 0 to 10 000, whereas, the amount of Malaysian and Singaporean had rise to almost 20000 in the same period of years. Although there was a slight fall of both countries, Hong Kong and Malaysia, with approximately 16 000 and 17000, respectively, they had a sudden growth to nearly 20000 students in 2000 year.
By contrast, students from Indonesia started coming in 1983 and it rose significantly over the period of 16 years and reached over 25 000 students. Nonetheless, it suddenly dropped marginally to 21000 students in 1999. Despite the fall, it had a little growth by the end of June in 2000 with around 23 000 students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
This line graph below provides us information on compar...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Kong
...ta, residence of overseas students from Kong Kong, Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore in A...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ia, Indonesia and Singapore in Australia on an interval scale between 1982 and 20...
^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... It's clearly seen that the arrival of students from all four countries to ...
^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...val of students from all four countries to Australia increased considerably over...
^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tuated wildly between 1987 to 2000 years with the number from 0 to 10 000, where...
^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...87 to 2000 years with the number from 0 to 10 000, whereas, the amount of Malay...
^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom 0 to 10 000, whereas, the amount of Malaysian and Singaporean had rise to ...
^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f Malaysian and Singaporean had rise to almost 20000 in the same period of years...
^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere was a slight fall of both countries, Hong Kong and Malaysia, with approxima...
^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t fall of both countries, Hong Kong and Malaysia, with approximately 16 000 and...
^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oth countries, Hong Kong and Malaysia, with approximately 16 000 and 17000, res...
^^
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...16 000 and 17000, respectively, they had a sudden growth to nearly 20000 students...
^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h by the end of June in 2000 with around 23 000 students.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nonetheless, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07929515419 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69272925056 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5859030837 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8723247145 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.111111111 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142051801206 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612183809962 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718241468318 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109606591547 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837675496288 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.