This line graph below illustrates us comparison of four nominal data, the changing patterns of mobile phone, CD player, Internet access and home computer in homes of the UK on an interval scale between 1996 and 2003.
Overall, it is obvious that all accesses had a gradual rise between 10 and 80 percent from 1996 to 2003 years. Mobile phone is reported as the most dramatic change among other accesses over the period.
In 1996/97 the access of home computer to modern technology was about 23 percent and had a gradual rise up to almost 58 percent by 2003 year, while the access of mobile phone was just under 20 percent and had a significant growth over 60 percent. It is clearly seen that between 1999 and 2000 years, an access of mobile phone fluctuated slightly from around 30 percent to over 40 percent and exceeded an access of home computer for 3 percent.
In terms of CD player, in 1999 it had the highest percentage (60%) and grew steadily up to 83 percent by 2000. By contrast, internet access appeared only in 1999 and rose considerably up to 43 percent. Although, the Internet access is reported as the lowest in the graph, it had an increase for 20 percent in comparison with CD player which rose for only for 10 percent between 1999 - 2003 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
This line graph below illustrates us comparison of fou...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
This line graph below illustrates us comparison of four nominal data, the cha...
^^
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...layer, Internet access and home computer in homes of the UK on an interval scale ...
^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in homes of the UK on an interval scale between 1996 and 2003. Overall, it i...
^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous that all accesses had a gradual rise between 10 and 80 percent from 1996 to 2...
^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt from 1996 to 2003 years. Mobile phone is reported as the most dramatic change ...
^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
... seen that between 1999 and 2000 years, an access of mobile phone fluctuated slightly fro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...percent to over 40 percent and exceeded an access of home computer for 3 percent. In ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iderably up to 43 percent. Although, the Internet access is reported as the lowes...
^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is reported as the lowest in the graph, it had an increase for 20 percent in com...
^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crease for 20 percent in comparison with CD player which rose for only for 10 per...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62831858407 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41547116742 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508849557522 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.4258992359 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.75 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171573717236 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870073057944 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639269928288 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125306200002 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716580527444 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.