This line graph below provides us information on comparison of four nominal data, residence of overseas students from Kong Kong, Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore in Australia on an interval scale between 1982 and 2000 years.
Clearly, the arrival of students from all four countries to Australia increased considerably over the period of 18 years. Indonesia is reported as the most dramatic change among other countries.
In 1982, there were no students from Singapore and Hong Kong and remained fairly steady until 1987, while the number of students from Malaysia was about 5000 and stayed static until 1990. However, the figure of Hong Kong learners fluctuated wildly between 1987 to 2000 years with the number from 0 to 10 000, whereas, the Malaysian and Singaporean learners h rose significantly to almost 20000 in the same period of years. Although there was a slight fall of both countries, Hong Kong and Malaysia, with approximately 16 000 and 17000, respectively, they had a sudden growth to nearly 20000 students in 2000 year.
By contrast, students from Indonesia started coming in 1983 and fortunately, it increased dramatically over the period 16 years and peaked over 25 000 students. Nonetheless, it suddenly dropped marginally from approximately 23000 students to 21000 students in 1999. Despite the fall, it had a little growth by the end of June in 2000 with around 24 000 students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
This line graph below provides us information on compar...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Kong
...ta, residence of overseas students from Kong Kong, Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore in A...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ia, Indonesia and Singapore in Australia on an interval scale between 1982 and 20...
^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tween 1982 and 2000 years. Clearly, the arrival of students from all four c...
^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 2000 years. Clearly, the arrival of students from all four countries to ...
^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...val of students from all four countries to Australia increased considerably over...
^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gapore and Hong Kong and remained fairly steady until 1987, while the number of s...
^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d static until 1990. However, the figure of Hong Kong learners fluctuated wildly ...
^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tuated wildly between 1987 to 2000 years with the number from 0 to 10 000, where...
^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...87 to 2000 years with the number from 0 to 10 000, whereas, the Malaysian and S...
^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e number from 0 to 10 000, whereas, the Malaysian and Singaporean learners h ro...
^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the Malaysian and Singaporean learners h rose significantly to almost 20000 ...
^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngaporean learners h rose significantly to almost 20000 in the same period of ...
^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orean learners h rose significantly to almost 20000 in the same period of years...
^^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere was a slight fall of both countries, Hong Kong and Malaysia, with approxima...
^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t fall of both countries, Hong Kong and Malaysia, with approximately 16 000 and...
^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oth countries, Hong Kong and Malaysia, with approximately 16 000 and 17000, res...
^^
Line 5, column 571, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...16 000 and 17000, respectively, they had a sudden growth to nearly 20000 students...
^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... started coming in 1983 and fortunately, it increased dramatically over the peri...
^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fortunately, it increased dramatically over the period 16 years and peaked ove...
^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly over the period 16 years and peaked over 25 000 students. Nonetheless, it su...
^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly from approximately 23000 students to 21000 students in 1999. Despite the fall...
^^
Line 7, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h by the end of June in 2000 with around 24 000 students.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nonetheless, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19298245614 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78628583153 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7348174067 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.555555556 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 23.0 1.69756097561 1355% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144566324339 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065059329489 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728626391989 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114588635466 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814811559168 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.