Here the chart demonstrate the information about that how features of fun had been utilize by financial income in three different types of nations in the year from 1995 to 2000, units are measured in money.
Overall, it is manifest that the most striking feature is publishing which dominance the market, however, cinema is made the least amount of ratio, and rest of the fluctuation.
At a first glance, the chart reveals that Asian people spend they income on television and publishing was presented well below 100 in the both initially year while remaining activities was made the minimum amount of spent money. In the year 1995, the proportion of television was just under 50 then it modestly inclined in the next given year to more than 50. It is interesting to notethat the same trend can be observed to publishing and music in the similar years.
Further analysis of the bar chart portrays that although the ratio of all the 5 features was depicts well below 200 in the year 1995, then the identical proportion had been significantly increased and reached to 257 at the end of the stipulated period
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'utilized'.
Suggestion: utilized
...about that how features of fun had been utilize by financial income in three different ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the fluctuation. At a first glance, the chart reveals that Asian people spen...
^^
Line 4, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r 1995, the proportion of television was just under 50 then it modestly inclined ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82722513089 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60217324772 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602094240838 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5603745353 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.666666667 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8333333333 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199682254438 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844242523814 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638746251152 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100913397921 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616855160717 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.