the best way to protect the environment is used in local resources like food and building materials rather than transporting resources from other places. to extend do you agree or disagree?
In the pace of life, Human being has been forgotten from the original task save the earth the extraordinary method to rescue the nature is that no need to relocate the various type of things from one place to another likewise food and building material. I firmly subscribe to the right notion and reason of my inclination is articulated in the upcoming paragraph.
The predominant justification to support my ideology is that instead of migrating things, folks could establish the particular product of factory in the indigenous area in order to fulfill their needs and by performing this type of way it would be not only secure the nature but also on unemployment trade would like to be mitigated after workers acquire jobs in introduced industries. As a consequence, the cost of transport charge will be eradicated. For example, in New Zealand, appropriate more than 70% of things had been started to use in the similar place in which it introduced.
Considering further, this is reasonable to the extent that the percentage of accidents will likely to be deteriorated owing to it contain heavy vehicles to relocate the items and during the journey sometimes jeopardy the things. Moreover, masses also obtain benefit from the non-transportable items. For instance, according to the survey of vehicle department more than 5% applied in the transportable thing and that taxes people must be paid.
In conclusion, Having gone through this matter it concludes that although to have the experience of newly things as well as different area products is a Paramount one, yet to rescue the nature comes essay first priority because save earth save environment
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e items and during the journey sometimes jeopardy the things. Moreover, masses al...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11397058824 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92659759922 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.4631267367 49.4020404114 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.555555556 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2222222222 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5555555556 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114678331355 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046326245017 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309718931784 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063867897166 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027007212806 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.