The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write

Here, the Chart demonstrates the varied types of age groups pupils in terms of study as well as the proportion of assisted by the workers, units are measured in percentage.
Overall, It is manifest that the most striking ages under 26 which dominance the market, however, rest of the depicts fluctuation trend of both for career and interest reason.
At a First glance, the chart reveals that the percentage of under 26 students is presented almost 80% for career purpose whereas the ratio for interest is less than 10% students. For the reason of career, the proportion of age between 26 to 29 is 6 times higher is as twice as interest purpose . It is interesting to note that the age between 40 to 49 is identical for both reasons, it is 40%.Those tutees who was over the age of 49 they want to study for interest is roughly 2 times double than for career, it is 70% and 30% respectively.

Further analysis of the chart portrays that the ratio of each under 26 students who have support of employer are well above 60% which followed by each 32- 39, yet nearly only 30% students remaining age of 49, the percentage of students which help is presented just above 40% students.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...6 to 29 is 6 times higher is as twice as interest purpose . It is interesting to ...
^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... higher is as twice as interest purpose . It is interesting to note that the age ...
^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Those
...s identical for both reasons, it is 40%.Those tutees who was over the age of 49 they ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, whereas, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5971563981 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55200449629 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535545023697 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0475613593 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.666666667 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.1666666667 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167506711517 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883429544126 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0140970840274 0.0843802449381 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976048257564 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223518525537 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.