The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makecomparisons where relevant

Here, the chart demonstrates the number of audiences which utilize the time on watching radio as well as television in per day in the year 1992, units are measured in percentage.
Overall, it is manifest that the most striking feature is television which dominance the market, however ratio is the least amount of feature which UK citizens spent the time.
At a first glance, the chart reveals that although the percentage of people who spent the time on television were presented well below 10% at 6:00, yet the ratio had been significantly inclined to nearly 50% people at 8:00 before experienced multiple times fluctuations. It is interesting to note that the after reached to the peak the ratio were presented rapidly declined to almost less than 10% at the end of the stipulated period at 6:00.

Further analysis of the line chart portrays that initially, the proportion of radio population were roughly 10% then it slightly increased to less than 30% at around 8:00. It can be clearly seen that the percentage of UK populations of radiologic was declined slowly and modestly at around 3%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94594594595 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72153439298 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.283179651 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.5 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8333333333 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0931693962385 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503566230774 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553276101756 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709585124524 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557538401914 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.