Here, the chat demonstrate the information about the varied types of gizmos which used to observed television by Canadian citizen between 18 to 25 age people from the Year 2009 to 2019. units are measured in percentage.
Overall, it is manifest that the most striking feature is conventional TV which dominance the market, however, tablet is made least amount of device and rest of the devices depicts fluctuation in both the years.
At a first glance, the chart reveals that the Proportion of conventional TV accounted of 34% in the year 2009 whereas the ratio had been significantly declined after a decade at 4%. The percentage of mobile phone usage to watch television were presented at 15% 2009, the ratio had has been almost double in the 2009 it was 26 %. It is interesting to note that the although the amount of desktop computer were made up to 18% in 2009, modest alter can be observed in the year 2019, by 7%.
Further analysis of the pie charts portrays that initially, The ratio of flat-screen TV was around 8% then in the 2019, it show nearly three times double, it were 27%. It can be clearly seen that the amount of tablet usage was around 5% then it rapidly rised at 19% during the end of the stipulated period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Here, the chat demonstrate the information abo...
^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Units
... age people from the Year 2009 to 2019. units are measured in percentage. Overall, i...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l, it is manifest that the most striking feature is conventional TV which dominan...
^^
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'made the least'.
Suggestion: made the least
...ominance the market, however, tablet is made least amount of device and rest of the device...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccounted of 34% in the year 2009 whereas the ratio had been significantly decline...
^^
Line 4, column 362, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the although the'. Did you mean 'although the'?
Suggestion: although the
...as 26 %. It is interesting to note that the although the amount of desktop computer were made up...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 124, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shows'?
Suggestion: shows
...n TV was around 8% then in the 2019, it show nearly three times double, it were 27%....
^^^^
Line 6, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s around 5% then it rapidly rised at 19% during the end of the stipulated period....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63926940639 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5618143106 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.3332643487 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147612447741 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575390863055 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056671133531 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892735312057 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528480035935 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.