The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
the pie chart below predicts the information about the form of media utilised by young population of Canada between age of 18 to 25 to watch tv programs in 2009 and 2019. As an overall trend, the usage of mobiles, tablets and flat screen television increased while conventional tv use decreased considerably in 10 years period.
In 2009 the 35 percent young generation was enjoying programs on conventional tv with the highest in that year however, lowest form of entertainment was tablets 5 percent. While destop computer and laptops were used by individuals by 18 percent and 20 percent respectively. Another type of visual media was mobile phones which account for 15 percent of other kinds.
In contrast, in 2019 the major and peaked popular media were mobile phone and flat screen tv roughly 27 percent at that year but, with comparison 2009 was lesser than 6 percent. On the other hand convential television usage squeezed to 4 percent only plunged in all time. All kinds of computers either laptops or desktop were 12 percent and of tablet 19 percent.
In successive years utilization of wireless devices culminated while big and completed screen time out.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the pie chart below predicts the informatio...
^^^
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
the pie chart below predicts the information about th...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the lowest'.
Suggestion: , the lowest
...tv with the highest in that year however, lowest form of entertainment was tablets 5 per...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...nd of tablet 19 percent. In successive years utilization of wireless devices culmina...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98461538462 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73681886774 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610256410256 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8027776729 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125264402905 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568882027532 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067556108941 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879361869757 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770587288931 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.