Individual should improve the environment or is it the government or large companies that should take action.
The environment is our home where we live and its cumulative responsibility of each person to try his best to clean it, from where government and multinational organizations responsibility to dump it properly. This is because if on of them did not participate than other efforts have not feasible. In this essay we will discuss why the both individual and organizational level work require to build environmental condition favorable for human and other creators because most immediate effector of environment is human activities.
Although some kind of pollution could not be address by people such as industrial waste and exhausts fumes coming out of factories but could assist government in house hold waste management. This is achieve by dumping garbage in particular site from where can easily picked by authorities for decomposing. Another responsibility which lies on shoulder of public to grade material according to recyclable and non degradable products. Many plastic and metal used products can easily remolds and reuse by processing and these material cause environmental pollution because hardly decompose. In many places government placed garbage collector for each material and many people put wrong thing or all trash in one bin that leads to difficulty for officials.
On the other side huge responsibility of government and large companies to save planet from hazardous effects of different type of pollutants. There should be laws and regulations to tackle a range of waste processing. The national authority have all resources to enforced laws on big factories and business to process their waste before its released in environment. Because release of byproducts in water bodies or smoke in air effecting climate change and global is warming. The government should built waste processing units for effectively management.
In conclusion, the question about whose responsibility toward environmental sustainability whether public, governmental authorities or large companies. In my opinion these three categories could not perform individual but collectively helping each other, and at the end al of us would get benefitted. The reason is if one of them would not do his work then its consequences would bear by whole planet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organizations'' or 'organization's'?
Suggestion: organizations'; organization's
...from where government and multinational organizations responsibility to dump it properly. Thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 391, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'building'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: building
...l and organizational level work require to build environmental condition favorable for h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'achieved'.
Suggestion: achieved
...in house hold waste management. This is achieve by dumping garbage in particular site f...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 267, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'pick'
Suggestion: pick
...n particular site from where can easily picked by authorities for decomposing. Another...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, in conclusion, in particular, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45689655172 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16851099889 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60632183908 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9096640132 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6875 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133626615971 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415564360192 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521114262513 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074382650741 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502413487828 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.