When the advancement of technology has become rampant in this competitive world, the role of technology has become vital to framing the development blueprint of the nation. There is an ongoing debate is that some individuals ponder that whether offspring ought to acquire knowledge via online materials or from the physical resource book. This essay will not only discuss the both the sides of the views but also explain that why I believe that first ideology is the accurate one in the upcoming paragraph.
On the one hand, It is often argued that a child should learn throughout online owing there is a simple reason behind this is that a child could easily obtain knowledge from online not only with 4k video but also varied types of games learning in which a child can learn via playing games. This is reasonable to this extent that a kid can also flourish they interest throughout online learning as well as have a more inquisitive to get more knowledge related to studies. As a result, a child can get more marks in they final examination, yet online applying this method. For instance, In New Zealand, nearly more than 70 % children via online learning by various types of websites.
On the other hand, rest of them folks advocate that the extraordinary way to get knowledge is from neither books nor from online due to the fact that whenever a child learn from book they can only impose on studies, however in online if anything arrived during the study time rather than studies then a child mind totally distract from the studies and encounter adversity barrier in the future. For example. In Singapore, roughly more than 85% of juniors study from the books only instead of implementing other ways.
In conclusion, weighting both the sides it concluded that although printed books is a paramount one to maintain the bygone culture, yet today modem technology should not be ignored and utilize that either child or adult no matter.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86746987952 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50514535121 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.8119295062 49.4020404114 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.6 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2 20.7667163134 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210605535798 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772652331021 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456292837975 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117996781989 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133184830406 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86746987952 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50514535121 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.8119295062 49.4020404114 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.6 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2 20.7667163134 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210605535798 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772652331021 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456292837975 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117996781989 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133184830406 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.