Some people believe that online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read, whereas others believe only printed materials should be used. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about what to use for a child to acquire literacy with regard to the internet. While some argue that the traditional paper-based way of doing so is profound, I believe that both modern and conventional methods can be used efficiently in this day and age.
There are various reasons why people opine that online reading materials ought to be used for children to have literacy skills. They may assert that reading sessions on YouTube, in light of visuals, are more likely to become more beneficial than books themselves. From a personal perspective, animated sources with proper audio can catch the attention, and toddlers will quickly imitate visuals specialized in building reading skills. Additionally, youngsters tend to know computer skills better if they are taught early, utilizing technology-dependent resources. Finally, automation is critical these days, and parent-friendly methods to teach children to read is fundamental since living luxuriously follows the competition in the job market.
On the other hand, advocates of printed materials have particular views in contrast to online ones. Firstly, as tradition has something to say, children learn how to read in an affectionate way when parents use paper books. More precisely, a sense of respect, as well as true love between a parent and a child, develop because of this traditional approach. Moreover, creative minds invented the internet, not using online materials as they did not have it in the very past. Thus, using books for children to read develops their imagination, resulting in great inventions further. Last but not least, while e-books or materials are considered harmful to children’s health, especially their eyes, printed versions play a leading role in bringing a healthy offspring.
As long as both schools of thought have sufficient reasons to choose whether online or traditional materials should be a primary method to teach children to read, I believe that keeping a balance between them would be more useful than one form of methodology. For example, having used both in moderate age, not only do children become accustomed to using the internet from a young age, but they also gain creativity, respect, and health along with speed learning. As a result, a toddler will be an ideal person having unique skills altogether.
In conclusion, although the internet might be a good source for children to learn to read, books can still be useful as well. However, I feel that if there is interchangeability between these two ways, it would be of great importance since toddlers will have a rare capacity using both forms.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an affectionate way" with adverb for "affectionate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hing to say, children learn how to read in an affectionate way when parents use paper books. More prec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have a rare capacity using both forms.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, as well as, in contrast to, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2226.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92102650971 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570754716981 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0962173586 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0555555556 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374139771029 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112646451604 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798169922684 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213431689123 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040345733361 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an affectionate way" with adverb for "affectionate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hing to say, children learn how to read in an affectionate way when parents use paper books. More prec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have a rare capacity using both forms.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, as well as, in contrast to, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2226.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92102650971 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570754716981 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0962173586 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0555555556 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374139771029 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112646451604 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798169922684 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213431689123 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040345733361 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.