Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
There is an argument that authorities ought to invest more on rail-line systems than highways. In my opinion, allocating more resources on railway networks are more significant for their environmentally-friendly aspect and convenience.
Focusing financially more on railways as opposed to roads is important because nature rejuvenates in this way. Since trains of twenty first century operate on electricity produced through solar panels or nuclear stations, environment tends to become fresher. While the opposite is true with vehicles, they emit toxic gases causing air pollution, resulting in global warming as well. For example, The Scientist magazine informs that the level of global warming and air pollution has decreased by half owing to electric railway systems. Thus, investing federal money on a rail line network has more importance than highways.
Allocating more resources from state budget to rail-lines is likely to be more efficient due to its convenience in costs. In other words, trains can include thousands of people without taking much energy compared to other means of transport such as busses which must refill their tanks more in order to do the same as a train. This means that the tickets are more likely to be cheaper than those of busses. For instance, In Japan most people use trains instead of private cars or busses thanks to affordability they offer. Therefore, countries should fund railways rather than roads which are commonly believed to be a bit expensive.
In conclusion, not only does more investment of government on railways improve the quality of environment, but it also provides more affordable commuting fees to public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The pie charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012
- Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction today To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes Other think than it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Computers are being used more and more in education Some people say that this is a positive trend while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-first
...ejuvenates in this way. Since trains of twenty first century operate on electricity produced...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
... this way. Since trains of twenty first century operate on electricity produced through...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37642585551 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95307310263 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661596958175 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5179895176 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.769230769 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109419657361 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425122976791 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303498222468 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0630279998355 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214031510969 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.